Sunday, June 5, 2011

Shawnee County Courthouse Eight Criminal Convictions of Battery Violence, Domestic Battery—While on Probation for DV conviction He sues custody of his victims infant daughter…… and gets it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OXZJd3Th37U

INJUSTICE IN OZ-- ARE JUDGE DAVID DEBENHAM AND GAL M. JILL DYKES ACTING IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD OR ENGAGED IN A COVER-UP?

Ms. Dombrowski isn’t Mr. Richardson’s only crime victim.  Somehow he cons, manipulates, badgers, and bullies his way into walking away with just a little slap on the wrist:  

  • April 4, 1984:  guilty of misdemeanor ~ 6 years probation and $50 fine; discharged from probation on July 18, 1984.  (82 CR 01860)

  • October 20, 1989:  guilty of battery against a law enforcement officer ~ 1 year supervised probation; charges of DUI and obstruction of justice were dismissed; $75 fine; discharged early from probation on July 24, 1989.  (89 CR 01537)

  • March 28, 1991:  guilty of attempted battery on August 13, 1990 ~ $283.66 victim compensation for medical costs; no contact order to protect Jon Rayls; no alcohol or drugs; 1 year supervised probation; discharged early on April 29, 1991.  (90 CR 1308)

Richardson Was on Supervised Probation When He Petitioned for Custody

Mr. Richardson petitioned for custody on March 4, 1996. . .three months before he was expelled from the batterers group for being a disruptive lost cause.  He was released from probation on June 13, 1996.  

Yet, the GALs and the court-appointed child psychologist perceive Ms. Dombrowski as the dangerous party.  In fact, GAL Dykes asked for an escort to protect her when she left the courtroom on Friday.  

You’d think with all the convictions, blood, cuts, and bruises they would be deeply concerned for the safety of the minor child and do everything possible to protect her from her criminal father.  Nope.  They’ve forced her to reside with a convicted criminal, his coffin coffee table, and the gun on the wall.  The courts have failed to protect her every day of her life. 

http://www.shawneecourt.org/doe/search.jsp?last=RICHARDSON&first=H&ALL=Y&close=&location=internet

New Search

Home

Case

Name

Role

92CV000432

-RICHARDSON,HAL,,

 

1P

92LA000089

-RICHARDSON,HAL,,

 

1D

95D 000419

-RICHARDSON,HAL,,

 

1P

95D 000419

-RICHARDSON,HAL,,

 

1OR

95LA014502

-RICHARDSON,HAL,,

 

1P

96CV000937

-RICHARDSON,HAL,,

 

1P

96D 000217

-RICHARDSON,HAL,,

 

1P

96D 000217

-RICHARDSON,HAL,, (aka)

 

1OR

96D 000217

-RICHARDSON,HAL,, (aka)

 

2OE

96LA012692

-RICHARDSON,HAL,,

 

1D

97LA009121

-RICHARDSON,HAL,,

 

1D

97LA017898

-RICHARDSON,HAL,,

 

1D

98LA006122

-RICHARDSON,HAL,,

 

1D

97U 000055

-RICHARDSON,HAL,,D/B/A/ TOPEKA VINYL TOP,

 

1D

90LA007629

-RICHARDSON,HAL,,DBA GATEWAY FUNDRAISING,

 

1D

97LA018158

-RICHARDSON,HAL,,DBA MINUTEMAN SOLAR FILM,

 

1D

96LA003402

-RICHARDSON,HAL,,DBA TOPEKA VINYL TOP CENTER,

 

1D

98U 000141

-RICHARDSON,HAL,,DBA TOPEKA VINYL TOP CENTER,

 

1D

04SC000200

-RICHARDSON,HAL,,III,

 

1D

03C 000086

-RICHARDSON,HAL,,JR TRACT 84,

 

184D

03L 010117

-RICHARDSON,HAL,,JR,

 

1D

05L 001833

-RICHARDSON,HAL,,JR,

 

1D

95LN000161

-RICHARDSON,HAL,,JR,

 

1OP

95SC000448

-RICHARDSON,HAL,,JR,

 

1D

95U 000500

-RICHARDSON,HAL,,JR,

 

1D

05C 001464

-RICHARDSON,HAL,,JR,TRACT 76, (aka)

 

133D

94SC000355

-RICHARDSON,HAL,,OWNER OF MINUTEMAN SOLAR FILM,

 

1D

89CR 01537

-RICHARDSON,HAL,G,, (aka)

 

1D

90CR 01308

-RICHARDSON,HAL,G, (aka)

 

1D

08SC000096

-RICHARDSON,HAL,G,JR,

 

1P

11SC000113

-RICHARDSON,HAL,G,JR,

 

1P

96LA000348

-RICHARDSON,HAL,G,JR,

 

1D

96LA019246

-RICHARDSON,HAL,G,JR,

 

1D

97CV000960

-RICHARDSON,HAL,G,JR,

 

1D

97LA011585

-RICHARDSON,HAL,G,JR,

 

2D

05C 001464

-RICHARDSON,HAL,G,JR,TRACT 76, (aka)

 

133D

96D 000217

-RICHARDSON,HAL,GEORGE, (aka)

 

1OR

96D 000217

-RICHARDSON,HAL,GEORGE, (aka)

 

2OE

97CV000778

-RICHARDSON,HAL,GEORGE,JR,

 

2D

82CR 01860

-RICHARDSON,HALE,G,

 

1D


90CR 01308

-RICHARDSON,HALL,, (aka)

 

1D

80CR 02333

-RICHARDSON,HALLECK,G,,

 

1D

04TR006740

-RICHARDSON,HALLECK,G,,III,

 

1D

99TR006118

-RICHARDSON,HALLECK,G,,III,

 

1D

03P 000633

-RICHARDSON,HALLECK,G,

 

1IMO

89CR 01537

-RICHARDSON,HALLECK,GEORGE,JR, (aka)

 

1D

95CR 00836

-RICHARDSON,HALLECK,GEORGE,JR,

 

1D

Thursday, May 26, 2011

Topeka (KS) M. Jill Dykes GAL- The Witch that Flew Off her Broom Stick.WHERES A PAIR OF RUBY SLIPPERS WHEN YOU NEED THEM?

Source youtube.

WHERES A PAIR OF RUBY SLIPPERS WHEN YOU NEED THEM?http://mamaliberty.wordpress.com/2009/02/05/wheres-a-pair-of-ruby-slippers-wh...

Wicked Witch Of Topeka Kansas—Shawnee County Courthouse get 1K each month for the pre 18 age of EVERY child she gets appointed too--- it is of course OVERTIME if she actually has to go to court to defend her right to be on case—such as keeping a battered mother away from her daughter—and leaving that child with Abuser Halleck George Richardson… Hal Richardson Wife Beater Topeka Kansas

wickedwitchofthewest1

HIS WIFE (m. Jill DYKES ‘told him what happened’. hence the phone call) He lies 5 x’s I counted about every answer and statement. KARMA comes in many ways—not judicial. beware of falling houses.

Entire unedited audio herehttp://bit.ly/lV0G25

HIS WIFE (M. Jill DYKES ‘told him what happened’. (by his OWN words--hence the phone call)  He lies 5 x’s - I counted. About every answer and statement.

KARMA comes in many ways—not judicial. Beware of falling houses. It is after all Tornado season.

http://youtu.be/OXZJd3Th37U

 

WHERES A PAIR OF RUBY SLIPPERS WHEN YOU NEED THEM?http://mamaliberty.wordpress.com/2009/02/05/wheres-a-pair-of-ruby-slippers-wh...

Court Appointed Child Abuser - M. JILL DYKES and her cronies can legally harass, threaten and have her HUSBAND CHRISTOPHER DYKES call a private number of a Battered Mother of the child who Mary JILL Dougan DYKES allows to be with a KNOWN, admitted and convicted ABUSER - HAL RICHARDSON, as they all get away with fucking and legally trafficking kids.


Its attorneys rule and the rest of you are all fucked! Entire unedited audio here http://bit.ly/lV0G25


Disciplinary Board says --- http://www.scribd.com/doc/56251013/2011-May-6-M-Jill-Dykes-Gets-Again-Rubber-...


 

Sham in Shawnee County Topeka, Kansas http://www.nowpublic.com/world/sham-shawnee-county-topeka-kansas
The last time I did court watch for protective mother CLAUDINE DOMBROWSKI, I called my subsequent posting on the experience "Showdown in Shawnee County."

See the post here http://dastardlydads.blogspot.com/2010/02/showdown-in-shawnee-county-we-final...

I can't even call the hearing held on October 19, 2010 a showdown. It was just a sham.
Let's do a little review. Claudine is a battered mother who lost custody of her only daughter in an ex parte hearing in 2004. (Ex parte means the mother wasn't even represented at the hearing.) Since then, she has had very little visitation. The hearing in January 2010 (see post above) was supposed to fix that. And finally, Claudine was awarded two hours of unsupervised visitation on Sunday and telephone contact twice a week. We figured it was a start.

Well, this was not to be. And not because of anything Claudine did.
Some serious healing was going on-- and in there lies the problem. Abusers can not allow that - It is their Complete control. Lets Review... Continue reading here: http://www.nowpublic.com/world/sham-shawnee-county-topeka-kansas


 

Guardian AD Chargem- M. Jill Dykes Topeka KS paid for by YOUR Tax $

http://mjilldykes.blogspot.com/2010/06/guardian-ad-chargem-m-jill-dykes-topek...


 

INJUSTICE IN OZ-- ARE JUDGE DAVID DEBENHAM AND GAL M. JILL DYKES ACTING IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD OR ENGAGED IN A COVER-UP?
http://annecarolinedrake.com/2010/08/22/injustice-in-oz-are-judge-david-deben...


 

THIS COTTAGE INDUSTRY OF TOPEKA KANSAS-- FAMILY COURT MAFIA AKA CHILD TRAFFICKING
http://jilldykes.blogspot.com/2010/10/this-cottage-industry-of-topeka-kansas....

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

 

Co Conspirators  (source http://dombrowski-richardson.blogspot.com/ )

 

31CC8BF1-AAE7-4B0E-9B6D-DE8A1FB0E506

Thursday, May 19, 2011

Peter Jamison: Parental Alienation: A 'Mythical Legal Argument'- PAS: Mad Science?

 

http://blogs.sfweekly.com/thesnitch/2011/05/parental_alienation_syndrome_d.php

California family courts

Parental Alienation: A 'Mythical Legal Argument'

By Peter Jamison, Thu., May 19 2011 @ 2:18PM

Categories: California family courts, Crime, Law & Order, Science

Share

Mad_scientist_caricature.jpg

PAS: Mad science?

Slate published an excellent story this week on the battle over whether to include the theory of "Parental Alienation Syndrome" in the next edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Like almost every other informed and disinterested observer who has assessed the validity of PAS, Slate senior editor Dahlia Lithwick takes a very dim view of the theory.


She also gracefully articulates the many reasons that the theory, as currently used as "scientific evidence" in family courts across the country, is pernicious. In a March cover story, SF Weekly described how PAS -- and its virtually identical variant, "Parental Alienation" or PA -- can be used by abusive fathers to win custody of children from protective mothers.


The theory of Parental Alienation, a term coined by the late pedophilia apologist Richard Gardner, posits that mothers maliciously brainwash their children to hold delusions of sexual abuse at the hands of an estranged father. As described by its adherents, PAS is probably the only supposed psychiatric condition that arises solely in the context of divorce proceedings, one of many reasons that reputable scientific and medical organizations such as the American Medical Association don't recognize it.


As Lithwick puts it:

... no hypothesis so rooted in gender bias should be credited by medical science. And because evidence of PAS is so frequently offered to counter maternal allegations of abuse, the experts testifying about PAS can be aiding and abetting a system that takes children from abused mothers and hands them right back to abusive fathers. Once again, this doesn't mean that some parents don't alienate their children in a divorce. It means that PAS is now used to discredit women whenever they claim abuse.


Of course, despite its tenuous scientific credentials, PAS has become the dominant psychological paradigm of the family-court system. The word "syndrome" is often deliberately omitted so that litigants arguing that the condition exists can avoid the unsavory connotations of the theory's origins, and most particularly its founder, Gardner, who argued that "pedophilia has been considered the norm by the vast majority of individuals in the history of the world."
Lithwick's conclusion: "While nobody was looking, a mythical legal argument known as parental alienation may have already taken over family courts."
Follow us on Twitter at @SFWeekly and @TheSnitchSF

Tags:

child molester, Dahlia Lithwick, evidence admissibility, family court evaluators, family courts, Parental Alienation Syndrome, pedophilia, Richard Gardner, Slate

Monday, May 16, 2011

Domestic Violence and Divorce - The Epidemic Facing Battered Mothers in Family Court

Dr. Jeanne King, Ph.D

Battered mothers in divorce court often look like "swine flu" survivors that haven't realized they are part of an epidemic. These women are in awe over what is "happening" or has "happened" to them and their children.

They go into court expecting "justice" and walk out thinking they missed the boat or those on their ship merely kicked them off. And from here, they franticly reach out merely trying to stay afloat in the wake. They are perplexed as to why and how they end up with supervised visitation and no custodial rights.

The Reality of Family Court

Divorce court is not the place to go to get justice for domestic violence; rather it's the place to go to get a divorce. You are there to seek assistance in splitting up the family estate and tend to the issues pertaining to child custody and visitation.

Now, some people will argue saying that their particular state has laws to protect victims of domestic abuse. Such laws may include statutes that assert a presumption regarding best interest of the children in the context of court-documented domestic violence.

However, even in these states, litigants are granted the right to litigate. And when one plays their hand cleverly, they can jockey custody via the use of the common and customary ploys involving legal domestic and legal psychiatric abuse.

Battered Mothers and the Swine Flu

I liken baffled battered mothers blindly hit by legal domestic and legal psychiatric abuse to uninformed swine flu survivors in the trenches of their flu symptoms. What they have in common is that both of these groups may be living a nightmare and not even realize the epidemic proportions of their condition.

If battered mothers knew of the trends in family court before they stood on the threshold of their proceedings or at a minimum while navigating the system, they could better protect themselves from becoming another statistic...just like those inflicted with the swine flu may have prevented their ordeal with some knowledge of prevention and early care to avoid becoming another H1N1 statistic.

Conclusions for Domestic Violence Survivors in Family Court

You must know the larger picture of domestic violence divorce in addition to your individual vignettes and concerns. You see, this picture is much bigger than you and your children. Appreciate that in order for you to best navigate your proceedings, you will need to be informed about domestic violence divorce, legal domestic abuse and legal psychiatric abuse.

For more information about domestic violence and divorce, visithttp://www.preventabusiverelationships.com/legal_domestic_ab use.php . Dr. Jeanne King, Ph.D. helps people nationwide prevent and remedy legal domestic and legal psychiatric abuse. Copyright 2010 Jeanne King, Ph.D. - Domestic Violence Prevention and Intervention

Saturday, May 7, 2011

Gov Brownback Signs Bill That Is Biased Against Mothers

 

It already had it for children over age 5 in the divorce and custody guidelines.
Guess now its birth to 4 ever.


April 7th, 201, Bill Signed by Gov Brownback has biased wording against Kansas mothers, see page 8, line C


""and there shall be no presumption that it is in the best
interests of any infant or young child to give custody or residency to the
mother.""  


"Mother"? Really? Couldn't this have been worded as "either parent"???

 
http://kslegislature.org/li/b2011_12/year1/measures/documents/sb38_enrolled.pdf


FYI, Kansas Constitution gives mothers equal rights to their children.


Constitution of the State of Kansas


Article 15.—MISCELLANEOUS


6: Rights of women. The legislature shall provide for the protection of the rights of women, in acquiring and possessing property, real, personal and mixed, separate and apart from the husband; and shall also provide for their equal rights in the possession of their children.

Monday, April 11, 2011

(KS) Battered Mother Who Lost Children and Appealed to Kansas Legislature, jailed for 12 days!! OUTRAGEOUS! KSWatchDog

Abused Wichita mom, who lost children and appealed to Kansas Legislature, jailed for 12 days

By Earl Glynn On April 11, 2011
Print This Article Print This Article

Cecillia Arnold was released from jail on Sunday after 12 days. Her offense? She talked to her daughter in foster care.

Wichita.  Cecillia Arnold bonded out of jail on Sunday after serving 12 days in jails in Texas and Wichita.

Kansas Watchdog contacted Arnold by phone in Wichita late Sunday after learning about her current legal battle from a Wichita source.

Arnold said she was arrested in Arlington, Texas on March 29 on an outstanding arrest warrant and extradited to Kansas.

What was the offense?

As reported last year by Kansas Watchdog, Sedgwick County officials issued an arrest warrant for Arnold in Feb. 2010 after she talked to her older daughter while traveling through Wichita on her way back to Texas on Dec. 1, 2009.

Arnold’s trip back to Texas was after she testified before a Joint Committee on Children’s Issues at the capitol in Topeka about losing her daughters to foster care when she was an abused mom herself.

Arnold’s older daughter was in foster care in Wichita and Arnold violated a court order by talking with her.  For talking with her daughter Arnold became one of the “Featured Felons” in Sedgwick County in Feb. 2010.

Arnold said “they came to my job” on March 29 and she stayed in Texas jails in Arlington and Ft. Worth until April 7 waiting for “Kansas to come and get me.”  Arnold said she was transferred by plane to Wichita on Thursday evening.

Arnold said some Texas officials told her “we never see an extradition for something like this.”

The Wichita Eagle‘s daily bookings from the Sedgwick County Jail show Arnold was charged on April 7 with “Interference with parental custody; other than joint custody.”

The Sedgwick County Sheriff’s Office web site still shows Arnold as a wanted person.

On Monday officials from the Sedgwick County Sheriff’s office declined to verify anything about the extradition and declined to comment about the case since Arnold had been released.

The Sedgwick County District Attorney’s office on Monday said they could not verify anything about the extradition and declined any comments until after Arnold makes her first appearance in District Court.

Terry Grisham, Executive Director at the Tarrant County, TX Sheriff’s office on Monday confirmed Arnold was arraigned in Ft. Worth on March 31 and released to Sedgwick County officials on April 7.  A senior clerk with the Arlington Police Department confirmed Arnold’s arrest there on March 29.

Arnold said she was in Sedgwick County jail until Sunday when her dad posted bond for her.

According to Arnold she was given documents that her daughter and her parents will be witnesses against her at her preliminary hearing in Wichita on April 21.

In previous conversations Arnold said her 9-year-old daughter was upset and scared and had asked “Mom, are you going to jail?”  Arnold asked, “who does this do a kid” in making a child testify again her mom?  Arnold is 25.

Arnold said “I lost my job” after being arrested and is concerned that she will go to jail if she only has a court-appointed attorney.

In an interview in Topeka in 2009 after testifying to the Joint Committee on Children’s Issues, Arnold said she thought she could have done a better job representing her case than the court-appointed attorney representing her.  [See first video below, or listen to audio of her testimony below.]

Arnold plans to see if she has enough money in her 401(K) retirement account to obtain better legal counsel than she received in the past.

Monica and Albert Arnold are trying to help their daughter. They do not understand why they cannot have custody of their grandchildren if their daughter is denied custody.

Her dad explained “We don’t have money” and are limited on what legal help they can afford to give their daughter or to fight for their granddaughters.   [See second video below.]

Arnold’s parents, Albert and Monica Arnold from Wichita, traveled to Topeka in 2009 and 2010 trying to testify to the legislature on their daughter’s behalf about the treatment she has received from the legal system in Sedgwick County.

Albert and Monica Arnold are frustrated that as grandparents they have been denied custody of their own grandchildren.


Related Videos:

Abused Mom Lost Children; Appealed to Kansas Legislators

Grandparents try to appeal to Kansas legislature to help “felon” daughter with child custody


Related Articles:


Excerpts from testimony on Nov. 30, 2009 to Joint Committee on Children’s Issues:

Cecillia Arnold“I did all court orders and my girls were placed back home with me”

“The case workers changed many times. I couldn’t get through to them sometimes.”

“The reintegration itself … was going well”

“I had stability. I had a home. I had a job. I had everything that they would ask someone to do for reintegration to occur.”

“My abuser … was going to jail at the time at the time the girls were removed from home. He was incarcerated for, I think, it was two years for the crime he committed against me.”

“The girls were removed from home for the second time.”

“The assistant [Sedgwick County] DA … filed a petition for termination [of parental rights], and after … the trial termination was granted.”

“As of now I have not seen my children since March of this year”

“During the trial I had testimony from different people — the foster care parents … — their testimony was overlooked.”

“… bad experiences with DCCA …”

“They said the reason for termination was … me not following the reintegration plan. That was not true.”

“… the ball got dropped on me from the Agency that was contracted through the courts … They didn’t do the job that they were supposed to do, which resulted in my girls being removed from home”

Senator Oletha Faust-Goudeau: “Her parents are in the audience … They have been denied custody of their grandchildren, too, and told there were too old; they were too sick.”

State Rep Bill Otto (R-LeRoy): “Your rights are severed?”

Arnold: “My rights have been terminated … I have no rights to my children. I have not seen them since March. I filed an appeal that didn’t go anywhere. I’m here today because I want my children back.” …

Otto: “Where was your lawyer?” …

Arnold: “I had court-appointed attorneys … I feel I could have done a better job representing myself” ..

Otto: “This should not happen to anybody … I’m so sorry.” …

Chair Kiegerl: “Your problem mainly is with the courts, although, I’m sure, the agency’s testimony was instrumental in the decision. … My heart goes out to you …I wish there were a magic wand that … we could use to solve your problem.”

Arnold left in tears.

Listen to Cecillia Arnold’s testimony:


Contact: Earl F Glynn, earl@kansaswatchdog.org, KansasWatchdog.org

ShareThis

Posted under Accountability, Column A, Judiciary, Kansas Government, Legislature.
Tags: Albert Arnold, Cecillia Arnold, Joint Committee on Children's Issue, Monica Arnold, Sedgwick County

Tuesday, March 1, 2011

Republican Senate Majority Leader in Arizona involved with Domestic Violence: NO CHARGES FILED filed due to legislative immunity

Joint statement issues by State  Senator Bundgaard & Ballard on Sunday:
http://sonoranalliance.com/2011/02/27/joint-statement-by-state-senator-scott-bundgaard-and-aubry-ballard-regarding-friday-night/

Reply

Click here to see video with pictures.

Domestic violence is a huge issue that has affected women and children for centuries, and it still does for many who have been involved with some of Arizona’s state legislators.

www.azleg.gov

 

There are at least three state legislators involved with this kind of inhumanity towards our society’s most vulnerable.

Readers of Three Sonorans read about Russell Pearce’s past history with domestic violence, and how this may have rubbed off on his sons, one of whom was just arrested this month for the same violence against women.

What is even more sad is how members of both parties, including the Democrats, will actually make excuses for this type of unacceptable behavior, and start blaming the victim, but this is also part of the history of domestic violence cases.

From El Numero Uno vato in the state Senate, Russell Pearce, to now dropping on the deuce, the Republican’s number two, Senate Majority Leader Scott Bundgaard, who had his own domestic violence issue this weekend.

Scott Bundgaard, the majority leader of the Arizona state Senate, was briefly taken into custody on suspicion of domestic violence Friday but was released because he was immune to arrest under rules of the Arizona state Constitution.

via State Sen. Bundgaard involved in domestic violence incident.

Bundgaard gives his position of Number Two a perfect representation.

And just like another former state representative, Jan Brewer, who was busted with anextreme DUI and even caused a car crash on the freeway but was let go because of “immunity” and never charged again, unlike President George W. Bush who got charged with DUI, this whole Republican party seems to be drunk with power.

From recovering alcoholics like W and Glenn Beck, to Boehner who is as emotional as an alcoholic would be, our leaders are intoxicated with the power they have, and with this power comes violence.

If you are violent with the women and children in your own families, ones that you take vows before the Eternal God to love until death, then how are they ever going to care about the innocent women and children they kill in their wars, aka “collateral damage,” or the women and children they target with their policies?

Speaking of crazy policies, Scott Bundgaard is one of the co-sponsors of an anti-immigrant bill known as SB1225 which pretends to defend immigrant women from violence but really gives Sheriff Arpaio more tools to get tough on immigration.

Also co-sponsoring the bill with him is Ron Gould of the 14th Amendments repealing bills, and in total there are 10 right-wing extremists sponsoring this immigration bill.

The Latino community is strongly opposed to SB1225. For some reason we don’t trust Ron Gould and Scott Bundgaard to have our immigrant women’s best interests in mind. Forgive us for not trusting them… do you?

All Democrats should vote NO on SB1225! Now is not the time for right-wing immigration bills co-sponsored by Ron Gould and Scott Bundgaard. Now is the time to balance the budget!

Wanna sign on to Bundgaard's anti-immigrant bill SB1225? Ron Gould already has, and they are two teabaggers we can trust? The other names are blurred as they will be focuses of future articles.


Click here to see video with pictures.

This entry was posted on Sunday, February 27th, 2011 at 6:41 pm and is filed under Headline news, Immigration news, Right-wing hate, Women's rights, political news. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.