Topeka (KS) M. Jill Dykes GAL- The Witch that Flew Off her Broom Stick.WHERES A PAIR OF RUBY SLIPPERS WHEN YOU NEED THEM?

Source youtube.

WHERES A PAIR OF RUBY SLIPPERS WHEN YOU NEED THEM?http://mamaliberty.wordpress.com/2009/02/05/wheres-a-pair-of-ruby-slippers-wh...

Wicked Witch Of Topeka Kansas—Shawnee County Courthouse get 1K each month for the pre 18 age of EVERY child she gets appointed too--- it is of course OVERTIME if she actually has to go to court to defend her right to be on case—such as keeping a battered mother away from her daughter—and leaving that child with Abuser Halleck George Richardson… Hal Richardson Wife Beater Topeka Kansas

HIS WIFE (m. Jill DYKES ‘told him what happened’. hence the phone call) He lies 5 x’s I counted about every answer and statement. KARMA comes in many ways—not judicial. beware of falling houses.

Entire unedited audio herehttp://bit.ly/lV0G25

HIS WIFE (M. Jill DYKES ‘told him what happened’. (by his OWN words--hence the phone call)  He lies 5 x’s - I counted. About every answer and statement.

KARMA comes in many ways—not judicial. Beware of falling houses. It is after all Tornado season.

http://youtu.be/OXZJd3Th37U

 

WHERES A PAIR OF RUBY SLIPPERS WHEN YOU NEED THEM?http://mamaliberty.wordpress.com/2009/02/05/wheres-a-pair-of-ruby-slippers-wh...

Court Appointed Child Abuser - M. JILL DYKES and her cronies can legally harass, threaten and have her HUSBAND CHRISTOPHER DYKES call a private number of a Battered Mother of the child who Mary JILL Dougan DYKES allows to be with a KNOWN, admitted and convicted ABUSER - HAL RICHARDSON, as they all get away with fucking and legally trafficking kids.

Its attorneys rule and the rest of you are all fucked! Entire unedited audio here http://bit.ly/lV0G25

Disciplinary Board says --- http://www.scribd.com/doc/56251013/2011-May-6-M-Jill-Dykes-Gets-Again-Rubber-...

 

Sham in Shawnee County Topeka, Kansas http://www.nowpublic.com/world/sham-shawnee-county-topeka-kansas
The last time I did court watch for protective mother CLAUDINE DOMBROWSKI, I called my subsequent posting on the experience "Showdown in Shawnee County."

See the post here http://dastardlydads.blogspot.com/2010/02/showdown-in-shawnee-county-we-final...

I can't even call the hearing held on October 19, 2010 a showdown. It was just a sham.
Let's do a little review. Claudine is a battered mother who lost custody of her only daughter in an ex parte hearing in 2004. (Ex parte means the mother wasn't even represented at the hearing.) Since then, she has had very little visitation. The hearing in January 2010 (see post above) was supposed to fix that. And finally, Claudine was awarded two hours of unsupervised visitation on Sunday and telephone contact twice a week. We figured it was a start.

Well, this was not to be. And not because of anything Claudine did.
Some serious healing was going on-- and in there lies the problem. Abusers can not allow that - It is their Complete control. Lets Review... Continue reading here: http://www.nowpublic.com/world/sham-shawnee-county-topeka-kansas

 

Guardian AD Chargem- M. Jill Dykes Topeka KS paid for by YOUR Tax $

http://mjilldykes.blogspot.com/2010/06/guardian-ad-chargem-m-jill-dykes-topek...

 

INJUSTICE IN OZ-- ARE JUDGE DAVID DEBENHAM AND GAL M. JILL DYKES ACTING IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD OR ENGAGED IN A COVER-UP?
http://annecarolinedrake.com/2010/08/22/injustice-in-oz-are-judge-david-deben...

 

THIS COTTAGE INDUSTRY OF TOPEKA KANSAS-- FAMILY COURT MAFIA AKA CHILD TRAFFICKING
http://jilldykes.blogspot.com/2010/10/this-cottage-industry-of-topeka-kansas....

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• M. Jill Dykes
• Judge David Debenham
• Kansas Judges
• Attorney Disciplinary Board
• Domestic Violence
• Legal Child Trafficking

 

Co Conspirators  (source http://dombrowski-richardson.blogspot.com/ )

• Kara Haney, LSCW Topeka Kansas |Safe Visit, Access Visitation, Supervised Visits, Topeka, Kansas | Drex Flott LSCW, Topeka, Kansas | Odyssey Group Child Trafficking Ring |Sheri Keller, Shawnee County Courthouse CSO | Judge David Debenham Topeka, KS | Rene M Netherton GAL | Hal Richardson Wife Beater Topeka Kansas | Scott D . Mckenzie, GAL Topeka KS | M. Jill Dykes GAL, Topeka, Kansas | Dr. Milfred 'Bud' Dale | David C Rodeheffer, Topeka KS | Richard B. Maxfield, Custody Evaluator, Topeka, KS | Jason P. Hoffman, Attorney, Topeka, Kansas | Kansas Fatherhood Initiatives | Shawnee County Courthouse

 

Peter Jamison: Parental Alienation: A 'Mythical Legal Argument'- PAS: Mad Science?

 

http://blogs.sfweekly.com/thesnitch/2011/05/parental_alienation_syndrome_d.php

California family courts

Parental Alienation: A 'Mythical Legal Argument'

By Peter Jamison, Thu., May 19 2011 @ 2:18PM

Categories: California family courts, Crime, Law & Order, Science

Share

PAS: Mad science?

​Slate published an excellent story this week on the battle over whether to include the theory of "Parental Alienation Syndrome" in the next edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Like almost every other informed and disinterested observer who has assessed the validity of PAS, Slate senior editor Dahlia Lithwick takes a very dim view of the theory.

She also gracefully articulates the many reasons that the theory, as currently used as "scientific evidence" in family courts across the country, is pernicious. In a March cover story, SF Weekly described how PAS -- and its virtually identical variant, "Parental Alienation" or PA -- can be used by abusive fathers to win custody of children from protective mothers.

The theory of Parental Alienation, a term coined by the late pedophilia apologist Richard Gardner, posits that mothers maliciously brainwash their children to hold delusions of sexual abuse at the hands of an estranged father. As described by its adherents, PAS is probably the only supposed psychiatric condition that arises solely in the context of divorce proceedings, one of many reasons that reputable scientific and medical organizations such as the American Medical Association don't recognize it.

As Lithwick puts it:

... no hypothesis so rooted in gender bias should be credited by medical science. And because evidence of PAS is so frequently offered to counter maternal allegations of abuse, the experts testifying about PAS can be aiding and abetting a system that takes children from abused mothers and hands them right back to abusive fathers. Once again, this doesn't mean that some parents don't alienate their children in a divorce. It means that PAS is now used to discredit women whenever they claim abuse.

Of course, despite its tenuous scientific credentials, PAS has become the dominant psychological paradigm of the family-court system. The word "syndrome" is often deliberately omitted so that litigants arguing that the condition exists can avoid the unsavory connotations of the theory's origins, and most particularly its founder, Gardner, who argued that "pedophilia has been considered the norm by the vast majority of individuals in the history of the world."
Lithwick's conclusion: "While nobody was looking, a mythical legal argument known as parental alienation may have already taken over family courts."
Follow us on Twitter at @SFWeekly and @TheSnitchSF

Tags:

child molester, Dahlia Lithwick, evidence admissibility, family court evaluators, family courts, Parental Alienation Syndrome, pedophilia, Richard Gardner, Slate

Domestic Violence and Divorce - The Epidemic Facing Battered Mothers in Family Court

Dr. Jeanne King, Ph.D

Battered mothers in divorce court often look like "swine flu" survivors that haven't realized they are part of an epidemic. These women are in awe over what is "happening" or has "happened" to them and their children.

They go into court expecting "justice" and walk out thinking they missed the boat or those on their ship merely kicked them off. And from here, they franticly reach out merely trying to stay afloat in the wake. They are perplexed as to why and how they end up with supervised visitation and no custodial rights.

The Reality of Family Court

Divorce court is not the place to go to get justice for domestic violence; rather it's the place to go to get a divorce. You are there to seek assistance in splitting up the family estate and tend to the issues pertaining to child custody and visitation.

Now, some people will argue saying that their particular state has laws to protect victims of domestic abuse. Such laws may include statutes that assert a presumption regarding best interest of the children in the context of court-documented domestic violence.

However, even in these states, litigants are granted the right to litigate. And when one plays their hand cleverly, they can jockey custody via the use of the common and customary ploys involving legal domestic and legal psychiatric abuse.

Battered Mothers and the Swine Flu

I liken baffled battered mothers blindly hit by legal domestic and legal psychiatric abuse to uninformed swine flu survivors in the trenches of their flu symptoms. What they have in common is that both of these groups may be living a nightmare and not even realize the epidemic proportions of their condition.

If battered mothers knew of the trends in family court before they stood on the threshold of their proceedings or at a minimum while navigating the system, they could better protect themselves from becoming another statistic...just like those inflicted with the swine flu may have prevented their ordeal with some knowledge of prevention and early care to avoid becoming another H1N1 statistic.

Conclusions for Domestic Violence Survivors in Family Court

You must know the larger picture of domestic violence divorce in addition to your individual vignettes and concerns. You see, this picture is much bigger than you and your children. Appreciate that in order for you to best navigate your proceedings, you will need to be informed about domestic violence divorce, legal domestic abuse and legal psychiatric abuse.

For more information about domestic violence and divorce, visithttp://www.preventabusiverelationships.com/legal_domestic_ab use.php . Dr. Jeanne King, Ph.D. helps people nationwide prevent and remedy legal domestic and legal psychiatric abuse. Copyright 2010 Jeanne King, Ph.D. - Domestic Violence Prevention and Intervention

Gov Brownback Signs Bill That Is Biased Against Mothers

 

It already had it for children over age 5 in the divorce and custody guidelines.
Guess now its birth to 4 ever.

April 7th, 201, Bill Signed by Gov Brownback has biased wording against Kansas mothers, see page 8, line C

""and there shall be no presumption that it is in the best
interests of any infant or young child to give custody or residency to the
mother.""  

"Mother"? Really? Couldn't this have been worded as "either parent"???

 
http://kslegislature.org/li/b2011_12/year1/measures/documents/sb38_enrolled.pdf

FYI, Kansas Constitution gives mothers equal rights to their children.

Constitution of the State of Kansas

Article 15.—MISCELLANEOUS

6: Rights of women. The legislature shall provide for the protection of the rights of women, in acquiring and possessing property, real, personal and mixed, separate and apart from the husband; and shall also provide for their equal rights in the possession of their children.